If sharding is good solution, why are needed plasma and state channels?
-
-
-
Who said plasma and state channels are "needed"? They're just great tech and make things better than they would be without them. Ethereum is taking many tracks to scalability and even one of them succeeding is sufficient.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Sharding has been successfully done on an active block chain too.
#apollocurrency has implemented ithttps://youtu.be/pWge7m0SXHAHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
hey vitalik - you are awesome - just remember you are 6-24 months ahead of everyone else - so you need to give us time to catch up - don't stop being awesome - you are an amazing human - that's the hardest part of being an architect - waiting for everyone else to catch up
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I am concerned that in our haste to prioritize “scaling” we are now referring to failure at a ~1/3 (33%) threshold “secure enough, probably, most of the time.” What is the real point of all this if this is what we are meaningfully reduced to in the name of scale?pic.twitter.com/wQEAHabFUs
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Interledger protocol
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Heavily experimenting in this space Cheers
@VitalikButerinHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.