Why do you never mention chainlink when you discuss oracles?
Hypothesis / shower thought: any system of "formalized social status" without sufficiently strong mechanisms for preventing "I bump up your status if you bump up mine" agreements will, in equilibrium, either blow up or become isomorphic to a currency.
@VladZamfir @glenweyl
-
-
-
Why do you never mention Toyota when you discuss cars?
-
Toyota is the biggest car brand in the world, let's hope
#ChainLink becomes the leading#decentralizedoracle provider as well. Removing single point of failures from smart contracts will improve their functionality in a significant way. -
The basic principles of
#blockchain are Free, Open, Trustless, Borderless & Censorship Resistant. Keeping to the values will help move#crypto fwd. Contradiction of#decentralized Oracles will only impede adoption. Humility in the face of adversary make tech stronger.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sure, though I think "isomorphic to a currency" is a key emphasis. It implies that a very large subset of possible roads all easily lead to the same destination.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(A) maps to TrustDavis, (B) to quadratic voting :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Informal social status works okay at this; if someone starts giving out status for money, the value ascribed to the status they give out goes down.
-
But why would anyone give status without any benefit? Maybe not money but some other valuable thing. If you are a kingmaker you will surely try to benefit one way or another. **Can't believe "Skinny visionary" (as per Fortune) replied to me. A big milestone for me!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.