Okay, if this is the game now, let's play. This nonsense works both ways. Please explain why it doesn't harm the broader @YouTube community when Samantha Bee calls Ivanka Trump a "feckless c***," when Colbert calls Trump a "c*** holster" for Vladimir Putin.https://twitter.com/TeamYouTube/status/1136341801109843968 …
Fortunately the business freely offered the service to the public knowing ahead of time a customer could not be discriminated against by a civil rights class. Are you saying they knowingly made a fraudulent offer they had no intention of dealing with legally?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Flawed analogy. You are confusing refusing a design they wouldn’t make for anyone and refusing a customer no matter what design. Masterpiece offered the public preorderable customer customizable wedding cakes & refused to sell to a customer that wanted exactly what they offered.
- 14 more replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not so easily compartmentalizes. If I was at a business that told me they wouldn’t do something because of beliefs I’d explain what they are refusing is very much a part of my beliefs & continue with my order. Every customer has a right to believe in marriage regardless of séx.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.