skeletons teach us that moving too far along any good dimension perverts the nature of a being. they are the virtue of durability incarnate
-
-
-
they are a virtue incarnate, and yet they are bad, because you need multiple virtues. is a virtue even a virtue without other virtues?
-
splitting virtue-in-general into a list of virtues inappropriately assumes a simple factor structure. this is the message of the skeletons
-
No. Naming projections of Good onto Ways of Being is good to do, even if you don't have an orthogonal basis of Ways of Being
-
we aren't even in linear algebra land though
-
Even in meat land, a list of words doesn't code an assertion that the words name simple factors of a thing
-
hmm, no, but labeling them as "a virtue" regardless of the levels of the other ones kind of does
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Assuming you know Housman's "The Immortal Part" http://bit.ly/2hfId8J Gothick as fuck
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.