Preference utilitarianism isn't like total or average utilitarianism. There can't be a "repugnant conclusion" unless people prefer it.
-
-
yeah ok I'm just inferring what preference utilitarians might believe really
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and that people have tried to use "person-affecting morality" to get out of rep concl and it has other problems
-
Oh I think person-affecting is way different from what I meant
-
I read most of a paper on it, looks like it mostly means what I meant.
-
Which is what? In English
-
Something like: morality has to do only with people who currently exist.
-
A person-affecting morality has trouble accounting for concern for future generations.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.