Preference utilitarianism isn't like total or average utilitarianism. There can't be a "repugnant conclusion" unless people prefer it.
i think "selfish" means it's about things in your own life. wealth or success or love or whatever
-
-
I'm not sure, but in that case there's still indirect preferences on population. And those would be it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i don't have a hard criterion for what's selfish but i think "selfish want about population ethics" is weird
-
Like, it's still invalid to apply the repugnant-conclusion argument to preference utilitarianism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.