seems to me the relevant disanalogy is consumption has diminishing marginal U, altruism does not
-
-
if there's diminishing marginal U to things like lives-saved-by-you, then sure, spreading works
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
i guess, on reread, chris's claim is objective and subjective expectation should be treated difft
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
so the q is what's the meaning of actual risk and subjective uncertainty and why does it matter
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
that is, why should we treat these kinds of uncertainty differently in decision-making
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
maybe there's an argument in cases like moral uncertainty. like how ppl talk about parliaments
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
but i think if it's subjective uncertainty about something like how well malaria nets work,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
then there's no good case for treating it differently from objective risk due to idk world events
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.