@preinfarction in some relevant way. and i'd have to think hard about what the relevant ways are. and so on
-
-
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@preinfarction how does existence as causal proximity deal with when we're multiply embedded in a lot of things. for example1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@preinfarction i think normies think we're embedded in only one thing. because only the one thing exists1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@preinfarction or i mean, a very restricted set of things. like teleporter accident clones in a single physical spacetime1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@preinfarction so when normies say the other things we're embedded in don't exist, they don't mean aren't causally connected i think1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@preinfarction because then we'd still have to think about being embedded in them. what they mean is the other things actually don't exist1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@preinfarction saying everything exists is meaningful here1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@preinfarction if "exists" means "causally near", how do i label the thing that should make me act as if i'm partly embedded in a thing1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@preinfarction a thing that may not be causally near at all. anyway, whatever, i'm drunk and can't guarantee accurate opinions2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@preinfarction there's a ton here for people to potentially strawman, please everyone delete it in your minds1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@preinfarction i'ts too much effort to delete it in the interface so you'll have to delete it in your hearts
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.