@preinfarction (i think it's probably not obvious that this is a fair parody but probably not obvious that it's unfair)
-
-
-
Replying to @preinfarction
@preinfarction not obvious either way whether the brains sentence is a fair parody of the existence sentence1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit Local presence is a type of existence. Having legs isn't a type of having a brain.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
@preinfarction human having legs implies human having a brain though1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit Do you mean when combined with the assumption that all humans have brains?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
@preinfarction ya. like with the assumption that nearby things exist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit I did mean nearby when I said local. I meant something more like finite causal separation. Sorry. Does that clear things up?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
@VesselOfSpirit * did not. Also my guess is no, you'll still think that my thing is stupid and your parody is getting at something.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
@preinfarction i don't think it's stupid. just iffy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@preinfarction it's just like people are like. let's pretend we're caring about a different thing to make the analysis more tractable
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.