@VesselOfSpirit oh I understand now. Yeah I concur with that intuition.
-
-
Replying to @willdoingthings
@VesselOfSpirit I guess it becomes a question of trade value. How many stars does the FAI coalition have to give up? What if only 1/20th say2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@VesselOfSpirit this a whole other bag of worms but I have a theory that post-singularity resources are not scarce even for maximizers2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@VesselOfSpirit there is such an abundance that no trade-offs need be made at all. I'll have to develop that idea more at some point1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings sounds nuts but important if true1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit (I have a complementary psych theory that humans (animals) are nigh cognitively incapable of considering non-scarcity)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings seems like tradeoffs inherent in agents. "won't have to be agents" is possible i guess1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@willdoingthings on second thought, not sure what "have to" means here. seems being agent always beats not being agent1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@willdoingthings i mean there are choices and they have different expected effects and you have to choose between them1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit but for example you can imagine a situation where there is one optimal decision with no downsides, or having infinite time2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@willdoingthings *vague handwaving about extreme case with measure zero*
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.