The AI does not love you, nor does it hate you, or care about your atoms, but you pose a tiny threat and are extremely cheap for it to kill.
@willdoingthings i think various kinds of acausal trade are plausible, but leaving current humans alive seems a very specific outcome
-
-
@VesselOfSpirit I think "leave sentient life alive" is an attractor for FAI-like things whose strong preferences counter any low frequency -
@willdoingthings under your technological assumptions, they can be reconstructed anyway -
@VesselOfSpirit yes, but to our perceptions and expectations and values, original vs reconstruction may or may not be relevant -
@willdoingthings what does original even mean here -
@VesselOfSpirit not zapped by uFAI then later reconstructed, instead kept alive etc by uFAI -
@willdoingthings what does that distinction mean. what counts as keeping alive if "alive now and alive later" isn't enough -
@VesselOfSpirit continuous temporal continuity as seen by 3rd parties. It's a distinction that might or might not matter or be "fundamental" -
@willdoingthings what does that mean, do i have continuous temporal continuity when i'm asleep - 18 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.