@preinfarction how does that relate to the good and not bad
-
-
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit Failure to accept extreme implication of "not bad" principle. Deciding in terms of whether they presently want to do good.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
@preinfarction it's not an extreme implication of the principle. it's an implication of an extreme version of the principle1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@preinfarction "what is more important? food or water?" "water i guess." "oh so you value a lifetime of food less than a drop of water?"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit Hm. When I wrote them, I thought my examples were more like "Would you rather starve or dehydrate to death?"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
@VesselOfSpirit (Which also sound extreme because its references death, but at least it's not using different units for comparison)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
@preinfarction i don't understand; i thought stubbed toes was chosen for being not extreme1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit >"When I wrote them". I agree now that my first example were bad. Still looking for negative phrasing of the original prompt2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
@VesselOfSpirit The not badness people would choose a world with no feeling over one with balanced goodness and badness?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
@preinfarction or disagree about what constitutes "balanced"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@preinfarction this is a difference of language i guess
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.