Many say 0% is the ethical discount rate, even if indiv. choices have d>0. Do some argue ethical risk aversion is less than indiv. aversion?
-
-
Replying to @byrneseyeview
@byrneseyeview@robinhanson discount rate seems like the wrong place to fix that. exponential discounting muggable by exponential pop growth1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@byrneseyeview@robinhanson if decision theory gives wrong answer for some inputs, solution is not to make the inputs rare in reality1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
@VesselOfSpirit@byrneseyeview@robinhanson what if you're aiming for heuristics instead of solutions1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @drethelin
@drethelin @byrneseyeview @robinhanson if you're an antisemite, you can behave more morally by believing nobody is jewish. like that?
12:58 PM - 31 Oct 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.