@VesselOfSpirit @MakerOfDecision yeah if there's one thing NRx fundamentally doesn't do, it's use "authoritarian" as a term of abuse
@MakerOfDecision this sounds like a critique of libertarianism instead
-
-
-
@MakerOfDecision@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit Also, how is it a devastating critique of anything? It's mostly ad hominem. -
@FrameOfStack@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit The premise is sociopathic; not ad-hominem to say the idea, not the adherent, is sociopathic. -
@MakerOfDecision@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit Oh, well, p sure nrx is aware that the idea is sociopathic? Doesn't chnge th pro argument? -
@FrameOfStack@MakerOfDecision@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit Wait, the argument is that despite being sociopathic, they'd want to do it? -
@MakerOfDecision@FrameOfStack@VesselOfSpirit reversed sociopathy is not compassion -
@MakerOfDecision@FrameOfStack@VesselOfSpirit let's do the correct things and not worry about what the mentally ill would do in our shoes - 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@VesselOfSpirit Yes, it was intended to critique libertarianism - doesn't opposition to collaboratively building apply to most of#NRx? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.