Yes, but it's reasonable to be skeptical of any expectations >90% or so that any given global catastrophic risk will be recoverable and not, in fact, part of an existential risk.https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/1112433917326295040 …
-
-
(i think most global catastrophic risks are far less extreme than the world being bombed into the stone age)
-
i can see there being effects like "decreased social order leads to mismanagement of technological risks" but that seems too indirect to add up to 10% and you'd have to consider effects the other way, e.g. increased caution, fewer actors left
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.