Yes, but it's reasonable to be skeptical of any expectations >90% or so that any given global catastrophic risk will be recoverable and not, in fact, part of an existential risk.https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/1112433917326295040 …
-
-
seems like if we recovered from the stone age we can recover from being bombed into the stone age and still having wikipedia
-
(i think most global catastrophic risks are far less extreme than the world being bombed into the stone age)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.