we should name future periods the reverse of the corresponding past periods. for example if 34-23 mlilion years ago was the oligocene then 23-34 million years from now will be the enecogilo
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
David Manheim Retweeted Vessel Of Spirit
The only problem I see with this naming scheme is that it doesn't have names for periods of time more than 14 billion years in the future. (That wouldn't bother most people, but... cc:
@anderssandberg )https://twitter.com/VesselOfSpirit/status/1100933191647424513 …David Manheim added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @davidmanheim @anderssandberg
after the hcope kcnalp we'll just start over with the second planck epoch
8:27 AM - 28 Feb 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.