the reference point is 1995
-
New conversation
-
-
-
The only problem I see with this naming scheme is that it doesn't have names for periods of time more than 14 billion years in the future. (That wouldn't bother most people, but... cc:
@anderssandberg )https://twitter.com/VesselOfSpirit/status/1100933191647424513 … -
after the hcope kcnalp we'll just start over with the second planck epoch
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Would the one period be called Postnairbmac or Nairbmacerp?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.