it's hard to pretend an organization is in touch with reality and good faith if it cites climate as a main reason for saying it's "two minutes to midnight". there's ~zero support in the science literature for climate as existential risk let alone near termhttps://twitter.com/KelseyTuoc/status/1088481537744502784 …
-
-
2018 statement: "Although the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists focuses on nuclear risk, climate change, and emerging technologies, the nuclear landscape takes center stage in this year’s Clock statement." They do mention climate change a bunch but Korea was the main factor.
-
i don't get that sense from the 2019 statement. nuclear and climate are treated pretty symmetrically https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/current-time/ …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.