is it bad that if I see a multiplayer game that costs money, and it's somewhat competing against other similar titles, I instantly assume it's just DOA
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think for League nowadays it kinda works, they have a lot of systems ingame that get you quick access to new characters (good behavior through commends etc.) and in the end you have so many champs to choose from that fill a similar role, that u dont NEED all of them 1/2
However that will obviously not be the case for valorant and i definitely think its not ideal there
-
-
right but my issue with the league system is they let you play one free for a week then yoink it away. awful for new players. just make them all free, it's not like they don't make bank on skins anyway
-
I think the main difference with League now, is that the ability to earn blue essence to unlock champions for free has greatly improved, so there isnt a huge paywall now. Originally this was a massive problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.