you had play the game of distinguishing the facts or the law, minutiae the justice did not genuinely give two shits about, but that you had to pay lip service to nonetheless. somehow this made you feel smart
Pokaż ten wątek
in law school, when a prof asked you in front of the class why a conservative justice would rule one way in one case and contradict himself in a later case, it was considered unsophisticated to answer with: “because they’re a conservative and want the conservative outcome”
-
-
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
amazing really how law schools maintain the fiction that judges have any kind of legal objectivity
-
Ten tweet jest niedostępny.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
The policy school version of this is microeconomics and whatever class you take about cost-benefit analyses
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Me: Because conservativism means so much more than “make America great again” which Donald Trump thinks means “very fine people,” but we all know it really means people of admirable values and character. Inner me:pic.twitter.com/xOjqLuSXKz
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
-
-
A law professor once responded to an answer I gave with, “Does anyone have anything to offer besides Mr. B’s vulgar Marxism?”
- Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
Likely it's more about training future judges on how to sustain their ideological decisions with convoluted and mendacious reasoning & fictions than actually having legal students understand those decisions contextually. But this observation itself is vulgar marxism so ymmv.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.