There are no things, only relations b/w things. Or, uh, maybe there are only relations b/w relations. Or, uh...https://twitter.com/AlleleOfGene/status/728453988551548928 …
-
-
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
Fact that there's an infinite stack of higher-order relations makes "transformation laws are ontologically basic" position less satisfying
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian I know! It's the relationships in the infinite regress of "relationships between [...]". No more levels, prob solved :D2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @FrameOfStack
Value Of Type Retweeted Value Of Type
Value Of Type added,
4:51 AM - 7 May 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.