I could however imagine that I should have avoided including a link to http://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/ as I told audiences, that they may be able to download and alter the videos, based on the license I published them with (a @creativecommons CC-BY license)...
@TeamYouTube Two of my videos (original content) have been marked as spam/misleading content and were thus blocked, as I was told that they violated the community guidelines. This is not the case as I interpret them from my POV.
-
-
Show this thread
-
...and that using such software as youtube-dl violates your ToS. So my question is: Do I have to use a separate service in order to offer my videos for download and avoid any mentions to youtube-dl in the video description?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can always appeal for a strike that you believe was made in error. Here's more info about Community Guidelines strikes and step-by-step instructions to appeal: https://goo.gl/rjyZ3u . Hope this helps.
-
Well I did appeal but didn't ask the right questions at that point probably. That's why I reached out to you on Twitter. I can grasp why you streamlined your appeal process with 200 chars and a strict protocol, but sometimes it probably doesn't help honest users that well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.