Fellow devs - if you have a "repository"-like object that only has a single implementation do you do this? If so - why?pic.twitter.com/GRogvFc7qu
Pokaż ten wątek
-
I think that in most cases we wouldn't even need a mock, we could create a stub and do it manually - as long as this class is open. Having said that, I also think the problem is in naming, this could be a NetworkRepository, in which case we hide beneath the _needed_ interface.
But why not just mock a class if you can do it - which you can in the JVM even if its final?
-
-
We can do that, as a quick shortcut, as long as the mocking library allows it. My main reason is that the Repository can have a concrete implementation(Network) and I wouldn't want to leak that detail upwards.
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.