Iceland to become first European country to ban circumcisionhttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/iceland-male-circumcision-ban-religious-leaders-outrage-mp-bill-proposed-a8217696.html …
-
-
Systematic review does indicate that circumcision does act as a prophylactic.
-
But that research is being debunked and will be completely. Circumcision doesn't protect against HIV or other STDs, penile cancer is less likely than male breast cancer, and UTIs are treated by antibiotics. Circumcision is never a prophylactic.https://www.reuters.com/article/us-aids-circumcision/circumcision-does-not-affect-hiv-in-u-s-men-study-idUSN0345545120071204 …
-
Allow me to provide you with a systematic review which rejects your position.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5296634/ …
-
That review is from 2016 whilst the study on American HIV transmission is from this year. It's impossible for Brian Morris' review to "reject my position" when the study to reject didn't exist. Are you seriously going to argue that circumcision prevents HIV in the West?
-
You're dumber than a lot of the anti-vaxxers I've met. A narrow clinical trial does not supersede a systematic review.
-
You don't seem to understand how science works, which is evident with how you can't argue a single point or counterpoint from the review in this thread. Science relies on hypothesis, data, and testing. New data requires re-review. Stop appealing, start arguing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.