USU CEHS Stat Studio

@USU_StatStudio

design - analyze - interpret

Logan, UT
cehs.usu.edu/StatStudio
Vrijeme pridruživanja: travanj 2016.
4 fotografije ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @USU_StatStudio

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @USU_StatStudio

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. pro 2019.

    Each PhD admissions season, the number of emails I get from aspiring PhD students that mention my physical appearance is not zero.... and I guess I’m not really sure what to say about this other than that it really seems like it should be zero.

    372 proslijeđena tweeta 6.132 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. pro 2019.

    Compute marginal effects and estimated marginal means in : () update on CRAN! What's new? E.g. new models supported, better handling when adding data points to plots, nicer print-method! Effects plots for many different models made easy!

    1 reply 8 proslijeđenih tweetova 32 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. pro 2019.

    Anyone have a good reference discussing the balance between content validity and model fit? I'm arguing for the need to retain items in EFA / ESEM despite trivial cross loading because content validity matters. Anyone? I recall you 'meme'ing this lately?

    3 proslijeđena tweeta 21 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. pro 2019.

    The 5 stages of grades are due tomorrow Denial: Am I sure it's not *next* Tuesday? Anger: Why didn't I give them a shorter page limit Bargaining: I can do a little less today if I get up early Depression: I'll go joke about it on Twitter Acceptance: [launches pomodoro timer]

    5 replies 16 proslijeđenih tweetova 160 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. pro 2019.

    Updated the cover slide with the proper citation. Thanks to , & for providing such 😎 & 😍 work 😁

    1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 11 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. pro 2019.

    Sunday night project — 'hexmake', a Shiny App to create your own hex stickers 🤘

    11 replies 89 proslijeđenih tweetova 406 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. pro 2019.

    Introducing the schrute Package: the Entire Transcripts From The Office {}

    6 replies 51 proslijeđeni tweet 221 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. pro 2019.

    I've begun writing on the ggplot2 book again. New introductory chapter to extensions, to be followed be a number of chapters with examples:

    38 proslijeđenih tweetova 263 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. pro 2019.

    Placebo Christmases are the worst

    267 proslijeđenih tweetova 624 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    15. pro 2019.

    Feeling some deep appreciation for , this morning. On her Statistics of Doom channel, she has 225 videos on R alone. Who does that?!

    9 replies 67 proslijeđenih tweetova 295 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. pro 2019.

    On a medium timeline I believe solid training in mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) will become a highly valued skill as big data starts to realize how much and how quickly you can learn things by first simply talking to the people you are studying.

    11 replies 101 proslijeđeni tweet 405 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    13. pro 2019.

    needed an excuse to draw a snake screaming in a camel's face so

    29 replies 231 proslijeđeni tweet 931 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    13. pro 2019.

    () tests for missing (NA) values. is.null() tests for NULL values.

    11 proslijeđenih tweetova 35 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    12. pro 2019.

    I wrote an extremely controversial blog about how we use dplyr at the ACLU. Thanks to and the community for making it possible for us to use dbplyr in this unconventional way

    7 replies 77 proslijeđenih tweetova 312 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. pro 2019.

    Just thinking about how productively Ive used my time this year 😂🙈

    Bazzinga 💫
    20 proslijeđenih tweetova 199 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. pro 2019.

    tip: you can use file.path on URLs too, to tidy up long ones by line splitting: URL ="" --> URL = file.path( "", "presto-hive/src/main/java/com/facebook/presto", "hive/parquet/ParquetTimestampUtils.java" )

    1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. pro 2019.

    if I had a quarter for every time I forgot to double space at the end of a paragraph in RMarkdown I could retire yesterday.

    10 replies 4 proslijeđena tweeta 90 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. pro 2019.

    Welcome to the jingle jangle jungle!

    47 proslijeđenih tweetova 246 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. pro 2019.

    If non-experts design studies to test a vaguely specified verbal hypothesis using non-validated measures they find different effect sizes. What else did anyone expect? Can anyone explain to me why this is a landmark study (or why this was worth the substantial investment)?

    Give researchers the same verbal hypotheses, and they design different studies that produce reliably different support for them. New, landmark meta-study that raises deep and difficult questions for how we view empirical results in relation to theories
    Prikaži ovu nit
    7 replies 8 proslijeđenih tweetova 60 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. pro 2019.

    I used to really love cheeky titles, but after working on systematic review lit searches, I'm anti. It helps us include your article in a review it is contains relevant terms in the title. Important fields that authors control: title, abstract, author provided keywords.

    We have moved from funny titles for articles ('The Joke's On You: Effects of Humor On...') to titles that are meant to rile people up ('Everything About X Is Wrong And You Should Never...'). I get your title needs to survive on Twitter but I think I want to go back to the jokes.
    6 replies 8 proslijeđenih tweetova 37 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@USU_StatStudio još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·