So after reading the article, the title is misleading. Wahlberg was cast to replace Spacey. They reshot. Everyone came in for virtually free of their own volition. Except Wahlberg, who had not been paid for the movie yet. He was paid $1.5mil.
-
-
-
Actually, Christopher Plummer replaced Spacey. Wahlberg was in the movie to begin with. He’s just greedy, NBD.
-
No, he is not greedy. He is an A List actor with a better agent.
-
Also, she is an Oscar winner and he is not. It makes her a bit more A list than him.
-
Ya, not necessarily...I know I’ve paid to see Mark Wahlberg star in a movie more than once...Couldn’t name a movie Michelle Williams starred in, but that doesn’t mean I haven’t seen her in a role. Williams may be A list, but Wahlberg is a mega star, right or wrong, he’s the draw.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Personal standards don't really matter. It's about how much money his movies make. And when considering this he is faaaaarrrr above Michelle Williams, which doesn't mean she isn't a good actress.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Marky, Mark say it ain’t so. Are the last good guys in Hollywood Tom Hanks and Christopher Plummer? That’s it. Two, men?
-
Marky Mark is certainly not a good guy
-
Thank you! I was just about to respond. Saved me the trouble.
-
What's there to be good about? It's not like we gonna watch it free at cinemas...producers gonna make sums. Back to the main, he pushed for what he wanted.....what's not clear is why Michelle doing it for free...Mark is blame-free.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
She needs a better agent. Who negotiated that b.s.?
-
The same agent co that reps Walberg....
-
Wow. Somebody needs to get fired.
-
The agency should face a lawsuit!
-
For what? Williams is a nobody compared to Wahlberg.
-
She had every right to refuse the role for such small amount of shekels so I have no pity for her. People need to learn to cut losses or negotiate.
-
Yep. She's just hurting herself by complaining about it.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.