Agree. If he wouldn't serve gays, then there would be an issue. He serves everyone.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People have a right to be gay. People have a right to not like that. I don’t see how a private business must be forced to do something they don’t believe in. It’s a fine line but everyone has rights. (And don’t say “what if they were...”).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Easy solution: put a sign in business' window listing religious beliefs and/or who they will not sell their products to. Saves customers from asking, businesses from embarassment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a very difficult case. It’s discrimination but when does the belief of one person becomes more important than another?How can we find middle ground?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Gay and raspiest have the same rights.Gay rape more rape than any does.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No - it's about not treating religious freedom, one of if not THE most fundamental founding principle of this nation, as a second-class right!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I predict the baker prevails considering the recent decision with Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. Forcing the baker to provide the cake to the gay couple goes against the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
-
Nobody is being forced. The baker has a choice.
-
What are you talking about? The whole case is about whether or not the baker has a choice to bake for the couple! Colorado is arguing he DOESN'T have a choice. If he doesn't bake the cake, he is charged with a crime. THAT'S NOT A CHOICE
-
He can choose not to be in business.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I am not the one condoning discrimination.
-
You are condoning forcing someone to violate their religious beliefs. You are condoning destruction of the first amendment. The gay guys can choose another baker
-
If making sales is violating his business beliefs then he shouldn't be in business. People should not have to go out of their way not to be discriminated against.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No, it's about the First Amendment. Freedom of religion means you can't force someone to follow someone else's beliefs. The gay couple can find another baker because it's a free market. This is about the First Amendment and ONLY the First Amendment. Nice try tho.
-
Freedom of religion doesn't put you above obeying the law.
-
I read the law, and I'm no Supreme Court Justice, but this law seems unconstitutional. The Constitution and accompanying Bill of Rights are the highest law in the land, and no one is above that law, not even the ACLU. I'd be very surprised if they ruled against the baker
-
So we are going to have stores that say no gays allowed like they had signs that said no blacks allowed?
-
Segregation was implemented by the government. This is a free market. Are we going to force Christian bakers to bake cakes for satanists? How about forcing a Muslim baker to bake for a Christian? Christians are infidels to Muslims, just so you know.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.