No they have technology 2 determine seats n solve the issue be4 boarding.Also they have sister airlines that fly sametime could compensate
-
-
-
The slick airports just delay the flight claiming weather/maintenance until someone request another flight or cust go to other airline.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Umm, no. They didn't have the right. Just because anti-consumer policy exists doesn't mean it should. The law here is wrong. They effed up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't concede it has a "right" to take away something that was already paid for. Finagling legalese for a result doesn't make it "right"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
? Is this a serious question at this point? What they did AND how they did it are both unacceptable.
-
If this had been a cab would it have been different?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
why did they have the right to remove this particular passenger?
-
They had the right because they own the airline! Once he refused to leave he became a criminal trespasser.
-
and he purchased a ticket! So why was he singled out?
-
He was one of four picked by a computer to leave
-
and that makes it ok? I don't think so
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Should have removed crew first
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need to boycott United for 6 mounth! When do employees think they come frist. The customers come first because we pay there wages.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How do they have a right to remove someone who paid? United accepted his money and then denied him service. That's THEFT.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.