@USATODAY how can they do that ?
-
-
-
@Riefle23C@USATODAY Easy, Republicans did not get enough votes. -
@The_Democrat89
@USATODAY wow they must not have tried . -
@Riefle23C@USATODAY They did. Not like it mattered, though. I believe they needed 60 votes to get what they wanted, and only got 58. -
@The_Democrat89
@USATODAY that don't even make any sense . The Republicans have the house . But they don't want to flex the muscle
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@USATODAY That is great news - how many GOP Rep have you seen fight for their country as they would invading Iran to destroy nukes.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@USATODAY awesome! Finally AIPAC LOSES. Israel does NOT come before the United States.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@USATODAY@fawadchaudhry Good news for Iran and a potential disaster for SA and Israel.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@USATODAY@fawadchaudhry I think Obama will settle this,, A game by America...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@USATODAY@StellaInger our leaders failed us yet againThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@USATODAY it's gonna be hard to tweet after we are all vaporizedpic.twitter.com/pWpwhIbM2u
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@USATODAY they filibustered. Call it what it isThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@USATODAY Just another day in the life of partisan politics. .NEVER a concern about what the AMERICAN people want. .just holding on to seatThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@USATODAY biased much?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.