You should not have printed it.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You know that no one will read this. If you fact checked it and found it to be very slanted or false, DON'T PUBLISH IT - but no, you wanted views and engagement. Stop walking back mistakes and just be responsible in the first place - it's not that hard.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You consider yourselves a "newspaper", but in printing Trump's lies and distortions without counterpoint you proved to be nothing more than Fox News lite. I will no longer be reading your paper.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
False stories by 45 are believed by readers, especially older readers who cannot fathom a president as a liar. But Donald is a liar and con man. USA Today should have only published with fact check next to it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too little, too late. Take down the original article, and put this one in its place. THAT is journalism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too late. Your “fact check” shld hve been on the same page as the ridiculius op-ed. It was all a lie. You knew it as soon as you read it. But you did & said nothing until you were publicly pressured & humiliated & Politico put out an excellently annotated article. Shame. On. You.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A responsible paper would not have run it in the first place. But you should have AT LEAST done this fact-checking in the op-ed itself.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump's lies should've never been printed in the first place unless every point was able to be refuted side by side.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess it would have been too hard to fact check it before printing it.
-
Actually, pretty easy. Select All. Delete.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You should have done your job in the first place. And by the way, your smaller newspapers suffer from the same mistake-ridden, lackadaisical editing.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You published obvious partisan lies. You are complicit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, you have fact checkers and processes in place so "opinion" pieces are taken with the necessary grain of salt...but you intentionally didn't put these into place for his lying rant? And now, because you got killed on social media, you are publishing the facts? Gee, thanks??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WHY DIDN'T YOU DO THAT FIRST?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, you can't cover up the bogus Trump press release you agreed to print with an attempt at journalism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
McNews strikes again with a total lack of journalistic ethics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A few days and a few news cycles too late folks. You printed outright propaganda, do better
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seriously, a legitimate newspaper should not crowd-source its fact-checking post-publication.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.