So now you have to be a FOX viewer to get a security clearance? LMFAO
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would love to seeing you (or
@NBCPolitics@CBSPolitics@CNNPolitics@MSN@ABCPolitics ) do deep diving into whether@RealDonaldTrump could have getting the#SecurityClearance if he weren't@POTUS. I thinking that he would not--does that not putting#America at the risk? Plz dig!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Rogue" U.S. Gov. splinter group? Sounds russian, doesn't it? This type of activity is exactly what GOP has allowed to happen in our American government.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1984.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All is fine if they are a
@FoxNews ‘contributor’...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's how clearances work. This isn't even news.
-
Did you read the article
-
Did you even consider how security works? Even from the blurb and headline, this is a nothing article. If there are leaks, the executive (as the enforcer of law) must plug them. Protip: use dead drops to minimize contact hazards. Better yet, use a mail anonymiser.
-
Interviews are mostly plants and props, anyway. The stock that people put in interviews is wholly unwarranted, given the human tendency to confabulate in order to garner prestige. Anyone who is feeding interviews without corroboration is a winchell, by definition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.