Yes, he can and he should! They work for TV stations....should not still have security clearance.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, but ... There is a question whether Congress can petition the court for emergency injunction until national security is assured by special counsel...but Republicans won't ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In a word "YES", Oh and for you leftist libs, RINO's, Marxist, Socialist and Communists, Former Employees means they no longer perform a job, ergo, no access, top secret, secret is allowed, oh even private industry has same procedures.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I know he's not, but I hope he's better than this. It's wishful thinking. The optics if he goes through with it, would be bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They should have been stripped immediately upon termination.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He now wants to revoke clearances when his executive orders demanded that he be involved frim the very onset of presidential duties!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So just how many clearances has trump allowed that he now recants, and wants to revoke? He is admitting he allowed clearances to many that should not have ever been entitled! This then falls squarely on the shoulders of the person in charge of "due diligence!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well he can’t revoke security clearances to folks .... that DONT HAVE SECURITY CLEARANCE. Just like president ass can’t hand Putin British citizens
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did he authorize clearances to Comey, abd then he fired him? Did the "boss" not complete his due diligence in granting a clearance? So then who is guilty of failure in their executive duties?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As the "boss" willing to "yank" clearances, is he then guilty of giving some preferential treatment to some and not being equal to others?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#USAToday seems to make an "easy clarification" regarding the executive orders that govern security clearances. How is then that people in trump's administration, caught lying, still have clearances?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The answer is Yes. But SOMEBODY better stop him!!! Threatens & destroys EVERYTHING he comes in contact with! Unless it’s Russian.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Honestly, it’s hard to believe they’d even have security clearance. Usually when people leave a job, they are no longer privy to details or have access.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And put them in jail.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would be a sad state of affairs of a POTUS couldn't revoke security clearances.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He is a dictator !!!UH
-
He’s a patriot that loves America. Does that make you mad?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
