The judge said that she wasn't ruling on whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, she insisted the plaintiffs case just didn't provide enough proof for a trial. Cultists are going to claim this proves there's no collusion with Russia, but it doesn't do that at all.
-
New conversation
-
-
-
Hillary supporters will be furious
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Naturally, 'Mob Bosses' always have Judges on their payroll.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hope noone's celebrating based on the headline, although I know, many don't read past the big print. However, Judge Ellen Huvelle wrote that her ruling was "not based on a finding that there was no collusion between defendants and Russia during the 2016 presidential election."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would Russia have wanted trump over Hillary. Ridiculous!!
-
Exactly
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You sure showed him
@TheDemocrats
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because Putin really wanted to set up a dictatorship in the most powerful country on earth and put a Trump in place who will never use a Reset button? Yeah sure
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People commenting should really read the article before embarrassing themselves by saying “no collusion” and “winning”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
