Yes ... by a whisker eh? 7-2 is not close. Not at all. USA Today shame on you.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So this also means a Jewish bakery can refuse to serve a Christian customer. And a Muslim business can refuse to serve Jewish or Christian customers etc. Does nobody see the pandora box that has been opened? It will continue to make America even more hateful.
-
Freedom of religion not freedom from religion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
7-2 decision is not narrow it is compelling
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
7-2 is narrow? And you people wonder why no one takes you seriously anymore. Mainstream journalism is biased and dead.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Narrow mindedly would be more correct. Did they want a penis cake? Did they refuse a crucifix in the frosting? Go open a bakery at that FLDS compound in Colorado City.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
wasn't the ruling 7-2? that's narrow?
-
no, the ruling wasn't 7-2. The vote was.
-
The ruling was narrow as it pertained to discrimination against Jack from the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. But the vote itself was not narrow. My comment was more about the ambiguity of the headline not that the media was skewing facts.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The vote was 7-2....how is that narrow? More deceptive news from the MSM.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"narrow" doesn't mean the vote tally in legal cases. It means the decision is narrowly applied and not a broad direction. In this case they were specific , or narrow, in who the decision applied to and how it should be interpreted
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Surprised by basis of decision. Effectively rules against the prejudicial handling by Colorado Commission while basically leaving the hoped for ideological questions for another day. A one off rather than broad precedent.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
NARROW RULING? Since when is 7-2 a narrow ruling?
-
narrow legal grounds, not the actual vote. Some times you have to actually read, not skim.
-
I do read... The headlines are deceptive and you know it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.