In response, we’re updating our practice of not retroactively overturning prior enforcement. Decisions made under policies that are subsequently changed & published can now be appealed if the account at issue is a driver of that change. We believe this is fair and appropriate.
-
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
This means that because a specific
@nypost enforcement led us to update the Hacked Materials Policy, we will no longer restrict their account under the terms of the previous policy and they can now Tweet again.Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Great, ban white supremacists like Donald Trump.
-
Ive never heard a white supremacist condeming the practice.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
This implies there was anything "hacked" - nothing was hacked.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
The material wasnt hacked i the 1st place. Youd have known that if you had bothered to read article, or weren't corrupt.
-
But it was hacked. The fact the NYT doesn't say that is another nail in the coffin, not a freakin vote of confidence
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
“We change the rules when they harm Trump.”
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.