We want to provide much needed clarity around the actions we’ve taken with respect to two NY Post articles that were first Tweeted this morning.
-
-
The policy, established in 2018, prohibits the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization. We don’t want to incentivize hacking by allowing Twitter to be used as distribution for possibly illegally obtained materials.https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2018/an-update-on-our-elections-integrity-work.html …
Show this thread -
We know we have more work to do to provide clarity in our product when we enforce our rules in this manner. We should provide additional clarity and context when preventing the Tweeting or DMing of URLs that violate our policies.
Show this thread -
We recognize that Twitter is just one of many places where people can find information online, and the Twitter Rules are intended to protect the conversation on our service, and to add context to people’s experience where we can.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
EXCEPTIONAL AND WELL STATED
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Twitter love moving the goal posts to appease their leftie overlords.pic.twitter.com/VqdA5I82v9
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nothing was hacked. Hunter voluntarily submitted all his personal emails and never claimed them. Check your sources
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The hunter biden leaks weren't hacked. They were on a computer he forgot to pay the repair bill on that then became the shops property due to their agreement
-
Right. He just forgot to pick up a laptop with a bunch of sensitive information on it that a blind man copied and gave to the FBI. That’s definitely a really bad episode of some really bad TV show.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You had Trumps taxes trending for a week and they were illegally acquired and from an unverifiable anonymous source.
-
Notice the wording: “Commentary about the leak is fine as long as it does not include a link to that hacked information.” The tax returns are not even public information yet, so that means the NYT article doesn’t violate Twitter’s rules, as opposed to the NY Post one.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.