Wait...but your original tweet was literally about correllating the fact that segregation existed to the fact that harrassing someone is something businesses should be free to restrict. Clearly there shouldnt be 0 restrictions but you seem to be lost to the idea of context.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @guy_football @EricaJoy and
But then it, by the fact of what it is replying to, equates that fact to your belief that 'conservatives are censored online' or whatever
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @guy_football @EricaJoy and
Thats not a fact, that's a well known, documented, delusion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @guy_football @EricaJoy and
This one? You seem to be the one in a bubble if you regard a debunked story from 2018 as fact lolhttps://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2018/jul/26/shadow-banning-did-twitter-try-boost-dems-and-hurt/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @guy_football @EricaJoy and
Wait...Project Veritas and credible in the same discussion...LMAO
6:06 PM - 6 Jun 2019
1 reply
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.