Why is crowder a "conservative" here in opposition to liberals rather than a guy who actively harrassed another guy as a public figure? I cant see what "this guy" has done that is anywhere near what crowder did in this situation.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @guy_football @EricaJoy and
So by the nature of the company he associates with he deserves harrassment? Has being called a white supremacist historically lead to people being murdered or not being considered people? Do crowders intentions not matter at all?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @guy_football @EricaJoy and
Well you clearly are arguing in bad faith, but believe what you want. Its almost like you asked me 2 different questions then used my seperate responses to hide the fact that you cant account for anything I said lol. Good lord indeed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @guy_football @EricaJoy and
Wait...but your original tweet was literally about correllating the fact that segregation existed to the fact that harrassing someone is something businesses should be free to restrict. Clearly there shouldnt be 0 restrictions but you seem to be lost to the idea of context.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @guy_football @EricaJoy and
But then it, by the fact of what it is replying to, equates that fact to your belief that 'conservatives are censored online' or whatever
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Thats not a fact, that's a well known, documented, delusion.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.