I have never been paid to do a charity fundraiser on stream. But honestly I'm curious, Why is it OK to pay a streamer UNLESS they are streaming for a good cause?
-
Being paid to do a charity fundraiser seems very vain. You could be doing it because you want the pay out, not really caring about the cause, just the money. People doing fundraisers should do it for the cause alone, and if they do get paid, that should go back into the cause.
I was just thinking that when people work, they deserve to be paid. If I ran a charity, I would pay people for their time. For example I'd pay a badge or pin company to make ones with the charity name on it. I would pay for slots to advertise my charity on TV.
-
-
I'd pay them as well just not with mo ey people donated to that charity rather from another source
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's more of a bad optics situation. To some its a person profiting off of a charity but I agree, why not pay a high profile person to widen the reach of possible donors.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would say it depends. For me, as principle, charity should be pro bono. Larger streamers get clout, and the ad revenue plus subs already pays them. For smaller streamers I usually pay them with a sub (plus the donation to charity).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And speaking of work, last week my company organized an internal charity event for Unicef (children in Yemen), and doubled whatever we (employees) paid. No one was paid for organizing that internal event and managing it all, not monetarily at least. But respect is a currency.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But I get your point, although I think it's two separate things (correct me if I'm wrong). They wouldn't be doing charity, they would be working as usual, just so happens that the work they would be doing/promoting would be a charity, but from their POV would be work as usual.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some think that money being involved in a good deed demeans that deed. If charities had enough funding they would have no problem paying their volunteers. Not everyone is in a financial position to do charity work for free and if money is being offered for it, then so be it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.