Overview of support / dismissal of various scaling proposals around segwit: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Segwit_support …
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The only problem is that you won't be able to see any proper rebuttals to this assertion in the heavily censored r/Bitcoin subreddit.
-
Feel free to share links or screenshots
-
If the comment you shared had been posted on r/btc I'd have opened, read, evaluated it bec. there would be chance of proper rebut over there
-
Why don't you just post a rebuttal? I'm the one who started that thread. I'd be very much interested in a rebuttal.
-
Not even bothering to read it 'coz it's on r/Bitcoin. Post it on r/btc and I would. Interested in reading how people would try to rebut it.
-
Andy, why don't you post it on r/btc and if you get interesting feedback bring it back here? Gotta put in the work ;-)
-
Why would *I* post a view by the other side? I'm just saying I'd be interested in bringing up the link, but only if it had been on r/btc
-
Andy I mean this without malice but please take a moment and recognize how ridiculous you are sounding
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
It's a complete mess. Lets just hope all this attention to segwit in any configuration draws support for UASF Aug 1st.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
-
Without hash power support "pure segwit" is a vague term. BIP 148 is more specific, but requires measuring liquidity relative to SegWit@2x.
-
And when you measure liquidity, you should distinguish between speculation vs. utility volume. So localbitcoins opinion would be interesting
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
It's either a facade or it's not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
Not signing a tag in the field of applied cryptography SMHpic.twitter.com/Iq7NH5hQgG
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
-
What do you base the second claim on? Clearly not hashing power, but there's obviously other factors.pic.twitter.com/MVjegQGjuP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
Also the version number doesn't make sense at all. Sth like v0.14.2rc1 would make some sense, but v1.14.1rc1 after v0.14.1 ??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
This is FUD that's based on not comprehending different Git styles. Core works in private repos first to hide this public scrutiny.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo -
My lord. It sounds a lot like "script kiddies".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.