BBC 21/07/04 "Libya has shown concretely the benefits that can flow when leaders of isolated regimes make the strategic choice to invest in their countries' future, and not in weapons of mass destruction" http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3912503.stm … 2011 KCNA said DPRK saw enough to make a choice
North Korean state media highlights U.S. regime change policies - deposing Gaddafi in Libya, Hussein in Iraq, & the CIA-led regime change war in Syria - to justify their nuclear weapons. Gaddafi was promised he wouldn't be deposed if he gave his up, he did, we deposed him anyway.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Agreed Congresswoman Gabbard. The USG has absolutely no credibility when it comes to negotiating with regimes for change. None.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Our government had been hijacked by the sneaky wolves and they can not be trusted!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Yes. In Libya, under a UN resolution we "protected civilians" by ignoring peace proposals, providing air support for rebels until they chased Gaddafi to his hometown and literally, extrajudicially shoved a sword up his *ss. Let's get back to being the "city on the hill"
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
POTUS is not advocating regime change. He's advocating "America First" which is an approach much closer to live-and-let-live than regime change. If NoKo is observant (an open question), they'll get interested in what it will take to keep the US away. (Hint: not much.)
-
You're right, it's not taking much to keep the US away. As soon as a country has a few nukes and missle systems capable of transporting them to the US, the US won't dare to bomb that country. It's that easy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
We need to accept that not ever country on earth has the same interests as we do. Trade and diplomacy, not threats and posturing, are the best tools to turn North Korea from a mortal enemy into a potential friend.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Way to utterly downplay US annihilation of the ME for war profiteer$ by calling it “Misguided activities”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
You are just ignorant on the subject. in this case America is the aggressor, I have no love for the NK, If I had a clear option to only take them out, I would take it. But the people of NK and SK don't deserve to die, it's not our decision to make. Stay out of other country's
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WE have Zero credibility with the
#World & U cant blame them,WE need#Peace not more#Nukes!#Tulsi2020Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It doesn’t predate US global interventionism in general and the Bush Administration established full diplomatic relations with Libya in 2006. And I don’t think you need to be told how the Libyan Civil War started.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Without doubt, previous Administrations have treated Iraq, Libya & Syria most shabbily. And earned global distrust for the U.S. The track record makes it difficult for foreign policy going forward. To atone & mend.
@fubaglady@Celinetruths01@MiraGhoshal@j_chatwani@FaithJupiterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.