This war and suffering could have easily been avoided if Biden Admin/NATO had simply acknowledged Russia’s legitimate security concerns regarding Ukraine’s becoming a member of NATO, which would mean US/NATO forces right on Russia’s border
Conversation
Watch the presentation of Natalia Vitrenko, Chairwoman of the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine, on the urgent need for international collaboration on the denazification of Ukraine by peaceful measures.
Because she was not heard, this is necessary.
52
32
93
Show replies
Ukraine is a sovereign country who can make its own desicions and if that includes joining nato that’s not Russias concern
166
153
5,436
Probably you don’t know why Puerto Rico, Rhode and Virgin Islands are under direct US control. National security is a concern for any major power and it begins by having influence and control or your immediate neighbor’s actions and decisions.
2
no responsibility of russia?
none??
and you ran for president of the us?
extraordinary
148
253
7,754
Show replies
Ukraine gave Russia their nukes back after the USSR fell as part of a NATO/Russian agreement respecting their sovereignty.
So, what the hell are you talking about?
66
499
3,372
Show replies
You madam are a traitor and you are unfit to wear the uniform of the United States. didn’t call you a Russian asset - but if she had done she would’ve been being too polite
73
283
4,248
Yeah right, the little blue area is threatening the security of the area in red. Are you high?
824
1,677
15.9K
The large red area is not relevant, it’s the corridor between Donbas and Volgograd/Astrakhan that is.
This narrow corridor determines Russia’s access to many of its gas fields, the Caucasus, the Aral Sea, and the Black Sea - the latter being Russia’s only warm water ports.
13
32
380
Show replies
NATO forces have been on Russia's border since 2004 when the Baltic countries joined
What 'legitimate security concerns' has Russia faced since then?
88
151
3,487
Show replies