You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
1/3 If the government can change the designation of @Wikileaks from being a news organization (Obama Admin’s designation of Wikileaks) to a hostile intelligence agency (Trump Admin’s designation), then…
2/3 …any entity – online and offline – is in danger of being designated a ‘hostile intelligence service’ if they carry out investigative reporting that the US government or a particular administration considers to be hostile to itself. This will have a chilling…
3/3 …effect on investigative reporting of powerful government agencies or officials, including the president, intel agencies, etc. This is a serious breach of our constitutional freedoms and every American – Democrat, Republican or Independent – must stand up against it.
Tulsi has the good sense to realize one can't be anti-war & not pro-wikileaks - they go hand-in-hand!
Thank you @TulsiGabbard for breaking the silence and a TY to that guy in New Hampshire who asked you abt #JulianAssange!
#PeoplePower
#Up2Us'
#Unity4J
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=60&v=Q5Wd3C2s9f0 …pic.twitter.com/m09rh3G3m4
Here is the clip of @TulsiGabbard being asked about Julian Assange and @wikileaks.pic.twitter.com/oEbRvigJs1
Wikileaks is functionally an arm of Russian intelligence.
Assuming what you say is true, at least they are pointing out the crimes committed by the government and the sociopaths corrupt leaders.
This is a fair point. At the same time, if we can't distinguish between "journalism"--speaking truth to power & lighting up dark backrooms from what Wikileaks did--deliberately steal and leak information *for the purpose* of undermining trust in our democracy, then we are lost.
The people ( and the world) deserve to know the truth...especially when those in government can’t be Trusted
She is among the few I like. Gabbard/Omar 2020. One can still dream, right?
Are you saying there should be no oversight on what qualifies as a news organization?
If there were oversight, it would be contradictory to "freedom of the press".
You just won my vote.
I'm a Republican who will vote Dem in the 2020 primary for the craziest Dem but there are so many I guess it will be the front runner and then I will vote for #TRump so we can save the country.
Love it. Thank you.
Said true and much needed #Tulsi2020
Breaking silence on the corruption of courts/government to silence dissidents & crush #FreeSpeech #FreePress
They have us fighting over the 2nd Amend, while our 1st Amend rights are being yanked out from under us!
@TulsiGabbard donating to ur campaign right now-my first of 2020!pic.twitter.com/TEhyqhII2Q
I like the way conservatives refer to the 4th amendment as a technicality when evidence is thrown out because it was obtained without a warrant. “He got off on a technicality!”
What if they have been working with a hostile intelligence agency to attack America?
It's not America, right or wrong. If US agents have committed war crimes or crimes against humanity, committed crimes or help to commit crimes, then they need to be prosecuted. You can't claim you stand for human rights and rule of law, if you are actually violating them.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
