We are A source, not THE source. Please understand the process of interglacial periods then glacial, or 'ice age' periods. The current interglacial we are in began early due to an event roughly 12,800 years ago. That means this interglacial is destined to last longer than normal
Scientific consensus doesn’t get much stronger than this. We need to be focused on solutions. We can’t argue with nature. The ocean is not waiting for us to agree before it starts to rise. #ClimateJusticehttps://twitter.com/USATODAY/status/1100727948984897536 …
-
-
-
This means we can't accurately compare this period with previous interglacial periods via deep drill sheet ice studies etc. We just do not know to what level we are adding to warming. It could be nondescript or big. We can't let this become a political toy.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is keeping me from possibly voting for you.
-
Ignorance about manufactured or even self organized but false “consensus” is a problem. We should be cautious, but that means cautious about radical legislation too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How do we stop Lower Asia from dumping insane amounts of plastics into the ocean as well as radiation leaks from Fukushima? What about their pollution emissions which is far greater then ours.
#Gabbard2020 -
We need to do our part first, then we can address other countries. If we arent doing our part they arent going to follow.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There's a good bit of truth to this, but proposals like the GND will only stall the real conversation.
-
He is 100% right & GND is a crazy mess that is outrageously expensive, divisive and adds in all of this identity politics. No air travel - I'm sure politicians & the elite would still fly so you're creating strong class barriers. (If you can hear me from the "cheap seats".)
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Few doubt that humans contribute to the change in climate. Where we differ is to the extent of the contribution, how much the USA can really do to combat it, and what the result will be if not combated and over what kind of timeline.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It started rising nearly 10,000 years ago. You are correct, nature didn't wait. Mitigation/adaptation is a prudent move but assuming humans can do anything about sea level rise makes the "consensus" sound a bit narcissistic. https://www.iceagenow.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Holocene_Sea_Level.png …
-
Original graphic in context and for attribution:https://www.iceagenow.info/whats-new-sea-levels-rising-10000-years/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don’t fall for their click-bait Tulsi. Humans contibute to climate change yes, but at a much smalller level than most of the known factors. Everything we can do to reduce that impact is even more devastating to humanity, and will de-green the planet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
just remember plants breathe CO2 and give us back O2 for us to breathe it's normal eh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need a societal change. We have to start with an Anti-War Platform since these illegal wars have been over Oil. To enable war journalists have been manufacturing consent. We should have a War Crimes Tribunal along with a bench for journalists. They owe an apology to deniers
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The source data for this report needs to be examined and also see who funded it. That aside, the absolute worst thing we could do is give the government money to solve this. As evidenced by everything govt 'fixes', it makes worse than before and cost goes up exponentially.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I remember when the consensus said white bread was good and an ice age was coming.
-
And margarine was so much healthier than butter!https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/butter-vs-margarine …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed but it seems to be a waste of time trying to convince anyone. Common sense should tell anyone that there is no way CO2 can control the climate because it is only 0.04% of the atmosphere. If the US stops all CO2, China and India will continue to ensure "climate change".
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Right!
@repAOC is doing a multi-state tour to push that#GreenNewDisaster and no doubt travelling in a fancy government plane to do so. The rich and politicians will still be using planes but normal people will be stuck in our locations and that is scary and ominous. - 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.