I boil it down to ‘has awareness w/out objects been recognized as the source of the experience of being’.
Conversation
Very Zen. But then, you could also just do Theravada/Vajrayana and do fucking magic. Not that I would recommend it, personally.
1
Vajrayana, I personally doubt it. I know many people who are as on the mark from Theravada as anyone else can claim, with or without magic.
1
I didn't say I believe in magic. I said people who practice it sometimes have powerful realizations akin to results from meditation.
When they don't go completely insane, that is.
Well, sometimes then, too.
1
1
2
I don't "believe" in meditation either. It just happens to do some cool things, which seems reason enough to take it seriously.
I know meditators who claim things I have never experienced nor can substantiate that anyone else has experienced. I am skeptical of any such claim.
1
1
2
But this also segues nicely into why I am skeptical of dismissive or proscriptive claims.
You haven't experienced A, B or C doing X, Y or Z? I hesitate to care.
1
1
1
I don't mean to imply everything has the same ontological status, but there are so many times I experienced something A) someone said was impossible or B) someone said was irrelevant, that was fun or transformative.
So I don't believe those claims more than I do flying yogins.
2
1
In the 90s I experienced a series of states where I felt like I was helping the spirit of Sri Sarada Devi have the sexual experiences that were denied to her thru her marriage to Sri Ramakrishna. It was way fun and likely transformative, but definitely not something to be taught.
2
1