Conversation

Replying to

and

Sure, in that context of practice that could be a perfectly reasonable way to train. One could also do the exact opposite and open to the full vividness of subjective space-time in all its bizarre co-emergent transient glory. Both could be valid approaches, among others 🤷‍♂️

2

3

Replying to

I don't give a fuck what people tell me for practice if it works. I would sing mantras over a sheep's skull if it would do something fun. But it can be a bit rattling to see "practice this way only" stated when it can't possibly be an authoritative claim. Where are the results?

3

1

1

Replying to

and

I think if we limit the idea of meditation as being attentional training, we can say that it’s best to keep that as front and center in the practice, which means ignoring the fireworks at every opportunity. Meditation is more for many, so it’s not a blanket proscription.

2

1

Replying to

and

Ignoring the fireworks, AFAIK, is standard to most. It's the approach to everything else that varies. Do you approach the Void, pull away from it, ignore it altogether, serenade it with songs...? Do you call the Void a thing or do you just think about Nibannah or flow? Etc.

2

Replying to

and

I boil it down to ‘has awareness w/out objects been recognized as the source of the experience of being’.

1

Replying to

and

Very Zen. But then, you could also just do Theravada/Vajrayana and do fucking magic. Not that I would recommend it, personally.

1

Replying to

and

does that work?

1

Replying to

and

Vajrayana, I personally doubt it. I know many people who are as on the mark from Theravada as anyone else can claim, with or without magic.

1

Replying to

and

I believe in magic I can see on my kitchen table.

1

1

Replying to

and

I didn't say I believe in magic. I said people who practice it sometimes have powerful realizations akin to results from meditation. When they don't go completely insane, that is. Well, sometimes then, too.

1

1

2

Replying to

I don't "believe" in meditation either. It just happens to do some cool things, which seems reason enough to take it seriously. I know meditators who claim things I have never experienced nor can substantiate that anyone else has experienced. I am skeptical of any such claim.

11:02 PM · Mar 29, 2018Twitter Web Client

Replying to

But this also segues nicely into why I am skeptical of dismissive or proscriptive claims. You haven't experienced A, B or C doing X, Y or Z? I hesitate to care.

1

1

1

Replying to

I don't mean to imply everything has the same ontological status, but there are so many times I experienced something A) someone said was impossible or B) someone said was irrelevant, that was fun or transformative. So I don't believe those claims more than I do flying yogins.

2

1

Show replies