both?
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
He may be slightly responsible for ruining his own reputation, in that respect. Guy was an egomaniac who couldn't handle being surpassed by Jung.
1
(Nor to bear criticism from anyone else - the worse the criticism of his worst ideas became, the more obtuse he became in sticking to them.)
1
All of which is a shame, because I completely agree that he had a lot of good ideas - just not much of a sense of how to preserve their memory.
1
However, happy to say this discussion has reminded me that I need to read more about the neo-freudians. Particularly, the hilariously named Karen Horney.
Many of her ideas (e.g. concerning narcissism) have held up remarkably well.
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
This is literally all that any therapeutic discipline has achieved. CBT is completely overhyped, for example. Results are... literally placebo.
Placebo is still a positive effect, but all the jockeying for position as a "scientific" method is utterly irrelevant when they don't produce better results.
Replying to
Well, when you put in the drug trial results that were witheld it turns out that a lot of drugs are in the nocebo side too.
2
1
er, not nocebo, I forget the name for placebo but the drug has an effect noticeable to patient, just unrelated to what it's supposed to do
1
1
Show replies