Conversation

Humans should count ourselves lucky that we have yet to encounter a more powerful species. The various sophistries we use to justify how we treat other animals and each other... we embody everything we accuse others of but worse.
3
5
Replying to
Dogs are violent no? Dogs kill cats for sport, cats kill mice for sport etc. Its Nature. To be nice to an outsider is unnatural, moreover to do so without trying bring him inside your circle is outside human nature.
1
Replying to and
You could even argue that the greater the intelligence, the lesser the respect. Jindos are extremely loyal, but they tend to respect rules much less than other dogs without a lot of training, and will do creative things like jump fences or gnaw through them that other dogs won't.
1
Replying to
No no the greater the inteligence the more widespread the respect, also respect for rules is not fear of punishment ie 'training'. Respect for rules needs to alignment of internal values with the rule
1
Show replies
Replying to
No I dont think so. Humans have learned to check their violence. Dogs respect their own. Its like all those mafia characters with an overweight value to family- their family - not anyone elses family, those are fair game. Hardly a healthy attitude.
1
Replying to
I agree there isn't anything healthy about a dog's attachment to family (except, perhaps, to the dog). I just think you were straining definitions a bit in your original point.
1
Show replies