Conversation

Replying to

and

Eh, I also said you could be great because your insight into people. You just need to understand what does what and thus is appropriate based on your insight.

Replying to

and

the real problem is figuring out what works for each individual when. Cookie cutter stuff doesn't work well for a lot of Westerners. We're too fucked up psychologically.

Replying to

and

Yeah, well, I was more poking fun at myself than holding you responsible for my supposed-lack-of-aptitude. I do think my attitude might be a slight problem, though, for like 95% of all students. I can be... harsh.

Replying to

and

I am usually gentle and cozy in person, but somehow (things I perceive as) BS around meditation etc. really grinds my gears. I think it's all the fraud and fluff, in the West especially but really just everywhere.

Replying to

and

I suspect a good scolding is really what most Western practitioners need if they want to make progress (been there, done that...), but if they'll accept it is another matter...

Replying to

and

Well, maybe. The question is what they're trying to get from it.

Replying to

and

Fair.

Replying to

and

The only stuff that really gets my knickers in a twist is harmful stuff. Practices or philosophies which can damage practitioners or people around them. Unfortunately, it's hard to know what all of that is.

Replying to

and

I have yet to meet a non-enlightened practitioner who wasn't knee-deep in the stuff, barring a few with exceptional teachers. Lot more ways to do bad...